![]() As we saw in the above example, if you over-quote, you risk relying too much on the words of others and not your own. Selecting effective quotations illustrates that you can extract the important aspects of the information and use them effectively in your own argument.Using the words of credible sources conveys your credibility by showing you have done research into the area you are writing about and consulted relevant and authoritative sources.Integrating quotations provide direct evidence from reliable sources to support your argument.Using quotations to support your argument has several benefits over paraphrase and summary: ![]() This is noted by quotation marks (” “) around those words. The University of Saskatchewan Writing Centre is also a great resource.Ī direct quote is the word-for-word copy of someone else’s words and/or ideas. If at any point you’re confused, or unclear, don’t hesitate to ask your instructor for help. We will now walk you through each source integration method, giving you opportunities to practice each one. We will go into the specific mechanics of how to cite sources in the next chapter. However, if you are not sure how to do APA citation correctly, don’t worry. You will be expected to use this citation style in your own paper. These citations are done using the American Psychology Association (APA) style. ![]() Anytime we integrated content from another source you have seen a citation that looks something like this: You have already seen citations in action is this textbook. Your RCM 200 instructor will be making sure you do this when they read your formal written report. This means that even if you do not quote directly, but paraphrase or summarize source content and express it in your own words, you still must give credit to the original authors for their ideas. One important note that we haven’t mentioned is that you are required to include a citation anytime you are using another person’s words and/or ideas. As you now know, there are three main ways to integrate evidence from sources into your writing: Therefore, being able to correctly and fluently incorporate other writers’ words and ideas in your own writing is a critical writing skill. When writing in academic and professional contexts, you are required to engage with the words and ideas of other authors. We have color coded the three elements again so you can better see where they are in the paragraph: Let’s look at a revised version of the above paragraph that does a better job incorporating a lead-in, a source, and analysis. It is up to you to be as explicit as possible by connecting your sources to your argument. It is not the reader’s job to interpret your writing for you. Students often mistakenly assume that their readers will figure out the relevance on their own, but that is not the case. Yes, the quoted information may be relevant, but it is not immediately clear how it’s relevant to the writer’s main point because there is not enough analysis. We do have some lead-in for the quotes, but almost no analysis is given. This will show you visually how the paragraph is arranged. Let’s look at the same paragraph again, but highlight the three elements we have discussed. Ultimately, the student didn’t incorporate all three elements for integrating sources that are recommended in the above video. We have a little bit of the student’s input at the start and end of the paragraph, but there isn’t really anything substantial in-between the quotes. The most obvious is that the paragraph is almost exclusively direct quotes. As we can see, the concept of communication is much more deep and involved than most people think.Ī couple of things should stand out. Instead, she defines communication as “less like a process of information exchange than it is like a process of negotiation, which almost always involves the interplay of assumptions, values, ethics, public or professional status, self-definition, personal feelings, and social needs” (MacLennan, 2009, p. “While it may be easy to visualize and understand, this model of communication is ultimately inadequate, since it implies that communication is little more than an exchange of information” (MacLennan, 2009, p. She goes on to say that this definition is not comprehensive enough. “Most people, when asked to define communication, would produce something like the following definition: ‘the transmission of information by speaking, writing, and other means'” (p. MacLennan (2009) explains that people tend to define communication incorrectly. People often have an inaccurate definition of communication.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |